When I was a philosophy student at King’s College London in my early twenties, I
came across a book called Confessions of a Philosopher by Bryan Magee. A history
of western philosophy told through the story of the author’s relationship with it,
it opens with a three- When Magee died in July 2019, aged 89, he left 22 books to posterity, ranging from poetry, travel and fiction to acclaimed works on Wagner and Schopenhauer. But it’s not just this timeless body of work that makes him so fascinating. As revealed by Confessions and three volumes of memoirs, Magee’s life was as rich and varied as his writing. Born in 1930 to an East End shopkeeping family, he won a scholarship to Christ’s Hospital and then attended Keble College, Oxford, where he took degrees in history and in philosophy, politics and economics, and became president of the Union. Magee packed several careers into the next seven decades: TV and radio broadcaster, roving journalist, member of parliament, philosophy teacher and author. He became a familiar face on TV during the 1970s and 1980s with two hugely popular BBC series on philosophy, Men of Ideas and The Great Philosophers (both of which can be found on YouTube). The idea of making Magee himself the subject of a book first occurred to me in spring 2020, almost two decades after my first encounter with his writing. As I reread Confessions during lockdown in rural southern Spain, public discourse about the pandemic was dominated by hysteria and groupthink. There was a conspicuous lack of critical thought and balanced argument about how to handle the virus. Magee’s writing provided the perfect antidote. Exactly when I needed it, here was a book that demonstrated a fearless independence of mind, a wholehearted commitment by the author to think for himself and see where it led him. Add to that some of the most lucid analyses of the great philosophers that have ever been written and it’s an exhilarating, addictive read. The expository flair that attracted millions of non- The clarity and scope of Magee’s writing has had an impact on readers in all spheres of activity, from acting and politics to business and journalism. While tracking down his literary executor online late last year, I came across a YouTube video of the celebration of his life held at Keble College in October 2019. I was surprised to see that one of the speakers was Simon Callow, an actor perhaps best remembered for portraying the exuberant Gareth in Four Weddings and a Funeral. Callow said that Magee’s 1966 book on homosexuality, One in Twenty, ‘changed [his] life’ when he read it at the age of 17: ‘It was utterly radical in the sense that, like everything else about Bryan, it was entirely rational, balanced, clear.’ Also present at the celebration was David Owen, foreign secretary under James Callaghan and later one of the founders of the Social Democratic party, who spoke of the influence Magee’s philosophical approach to politics had on him in the 1960s and 1970s. The clarity and scope of Magee’s writing has had an impact on readers in all spheres of activity, from acting and politics to business and journalism. While tracking down his literary executor online late last year, I came across a YouTube video of the celebration of his life held at Keble College in October 2019. I was surprised to see that one of the speakers was Simon Callow, an actor perhaps best remembered for portraying the exuberant Gareth in Four Weddings and a Funeral. Callow said |
|
|
that Magee’s 1966 book on homosexuality, One in Twenty, ‘changed [his] life’ when he read it at the age of 17: ‘It was utterly radical in the sense that, like everything else about Bryan, it was entirely rational, balanced, clear.’ Also present at the celebration was David Owen, foreign secretary under James Callaghan and later one of the founders of the Social Democratic party, who spoke of the influence Magee’s philosophical approach to politics had on him in the 1960s and 1970s. Magee’s literary executor is Henry Hardy, an expert on Isaiah Berlin and a Fellow
of Wolfson College Oxford. The two met at Wolfson in the early 1990s, when Hardy
was in his early forties and Magee in his early sixties. They became close, lunching
together every day and corresponding by hand: Magee ‘didn’t do email’, as Hardy –
now 73 and clearly more tech- The notebooks reveal Magee to be much more self- Hardy had revealing things to say about Magee, especially as regards his ‘massive’ egotism, signs of which are obvious in the Confessions and the memoirs: ‘Everything was about him all the time […] and he wouldn’t put himself out for other people.’ This was one of Magee’s ‘feet of clay’, says Hardy, the other of which was ‘a consuming need to be right and to be more right than his interlocutor. He had a way of shaking his head in a withering, hopeless kind of way, at the folly of somebody who he was talking to who hadn’t seen his point’. But the two never fell out – partly, I suspect, because of Hardy’s patience but also because Magee’s charm and conversational brilliance enabled him to ‘get away’ with exasperating behaviour. Hardy says he was ‘just wonderful to talk to, because he had an enormous range of experience in different walks of life and he was fascinated by politics, by philosophy – he was fascinated by people in general and had a lot of intelligent and telling things to say about all those areas’. Buried among the reflexive one- Magee himself attempted the task that he thought would be impossible for an aspiring biographer. He was the only person who could have given us an idea of what it was like to be him, from the inside looking out, and did so with characteristic vigour in the Confessions and memoirs. But autobiography complements biographical writing, rather than rendering it superfluous. The book I intend to write will provide a more objective, multi- |